Property:Analysis

From mywiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is a property of type Text.

Showing 17 pages using this property.
R
All who seek to reduce everything to either or yes or no deny complexity and nuance to divide us for their own power and aggrandizement need to now enter the black hole where time and light stop and we're all one.  +
Firefox is not Jack enabled and when I pass through Firefox Web Audio API to Jack (and from there to Ardour) we pick-up a lot of feedback/static Not sure whether it is a configuration issue or an actual fault but either way it is unworkable.  +
S
Those who believe their senses.  +
Hope to better understand the Schrödinger equation and improve the visualizations. I am finding a correlation between fractals and Mandelbrot states and quantum Eigenvalues due to the shared use of complex numbers. Is the square root of -1 hiding what we can't perceive but is there?  +
This both worries and concerns me. What does it mean when we say ''Scientists Have Made a Human Microbiome From Scratch''?  +
According to https://github.com/SemanticMediaWiki/SemanticMediaWiki/issues/2453 addresses the issue only updating the pages that reference the deleted page versus all that share the property. The fix is in Semantic Mediawiki 2.5.3 so I'm planning to upgrade prior to incorporating my tranactional content for the upcoming election. There will be lots of deletes. Came up with a circumvention. Saving in case it shows up again.  +
To give the machines and plants an unbiased chance let’s assume sensory input goes from 0 to ∞ with 1 representing the ∞ we talk about but physically never get to.  +
I can't deal with my thoughts and emotions in tweets, texts, or even social media so...  +
Afew days ago I started reading this, picking up where I had left off at Chapter 3. I intend to read the whole bible using The Catholic Study Bible. What I've taken away from the Song of Songs is I don't understand the adjuration (a solemn or earnest appeal) to not arouse or stir up love before its own time in Chapter 3 verse 5.  +
T
Wealth is even less equally distributed, with '''just three Americans having as much as the bottom 50 percent'''—testimony to how much money there is at the top and how little there is at the bottom. Families in the bottom 50 percent hardly have the cash reserves to meet an emergency. Newspapers are replete with stories of those for whom the breakdown of a car or an illness starts a downward spiral from which they never recover.  +
The bible I've been trying to read cover to cover for nigh on 30 years. The Old Testament is tough for a bunch of reasons but the major on is how to countenance what I see as evil today. Am I evil if I think the bible is wrong or is the word of God evil?  +
Scientists are finding the human genome way more complicated than they thought. All the non-coding RNA that they thought was junk is actually controlling the cells of the body triggering the production of the individual.  +
The Webb Telescope looks like it will be chang our views of us and our Universe for years to come.  +
W
I subscribe to the digital Washington Post. It has a definite focus on politics in the nations capitol. It is owned by Jeff Bezos the owner of Amazon.  +
Plan is to plan and document simplest upgrade process here with links and tools and then use this to trigger upgrades in the future.  +
I'm pondering what it means that the impetus back to work is not being driven by what value the labor produces but rather by the capital or profits it produces? I understand many services such as restaurants and personal service like salons are things we desire and don't need or deem essential and that desire makes sense to me but what is actually driving that desire and how we establish that worth to ourselves? Take sports for example what motivates people to spend thousands of dollars to watch 10 guys run up and down the a 94' wooden floor trying to throw a ball through a hoop but spending over $240 to feed a family of 6 $40/head is considered an extravagance? More importantly if both could be done better by machines (faster and cheaper) and we still rewarded the replaced laborers adequately why is that unacceptable? It's almost like where on a wheel running to get someplace but we just end up spinning the wheel throwing off resources someone else is gathering! Interesting power dynamic at work in the economy right now...What happens when you're forced to scale back to just what you need versus what you believe you want? How much do you miss what? Who is most affected by the draw down? Who does it scare the most? If you didn't have to run the treadmill to survive would you be more or less happy? Hw much do you really miss the satisfaction of work? Good time to think about that! To salvage the work when machines are more productive than humans you must redefine value. # Move away from defining the 'best' job as being the most profitable and efficient job. Looking back how many folks see the box building introduced in the 60s as being the pinnacle of human architecture. While they were the most efficient and provided the least space they were not the most livable. As in A Timeless Way of Building we have to reintroduce human specifications and art into our daily lives. Folks don't live and work in Firenzi because it's efficient. # We have to loosen the specifications on things so that all items, including people, are not FRUs (Field Replaceable Units). New electric cars for example should be upgradable in place as better batteries and computers come about and certainly the WinTel 18 month recyle money machine needs to be replaced with the Opensource refresh and upgrade cycle. Linux still runs effectively on 386 machines. # Finally we need to move to a service model employing machines to provide the best quality of life for the most people. The discord, inevitable from shrinking resources and growing population, can no longer be bottled up militarily. We need to move to a world where everyone is entitled to food, housing, health and education and they earn greater benefits by working to increase the abundance for all. Any occupation looking to hoard benefits for a few, like hedge funds, should be relegared to a utility while occupations like farming, teaching, building and nursing should be elevated.